|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
560
   |
Posted - 2016.08.29 16:30:39 -
[1] - Quote
Escobar Slim III wrote:I truly believe that this will be great for the game and those that are unable to play solo as intended to do so because they need links will have a major shock to the system as they find out what the other class of the player is now to do and always has been and some people out there in our game don't have the mentals strength to play as one player they need link ship on gate or in station bay or in deep safe spot and I believe that our education in the game now will prove that this mechanic was always broken and in places like such as in Amamake and the other lowsec pvp area, everywhere like such as in Ostingjelly and Heydieles, and, I believe that they should now not cry but instead make the effort to come down to the level of the man in the Rifter, of the man in the Atron and fight like true beasts. Now our education with thanks to the Fozzie and the other teams who sometimes don't sleep at night to make our game better and over here in the U.S. should help the players from all around the world and all in EVE because now you will understand and see when a link is doing a boost, and this should help lowsec factional warfare and should help the pvp community who are not the elitist mustwin crew who are not really skilled with a link boost and the Amarrian in pvp with Caldari and Minmatar and Gallente countries, now we see the birth of the greatest chapter of this great game and we will be able to build up our future in pvp. For our clone children, the pilot of the future will come into this game not knowing the pain and suffering of the old mechanics and for this I will openly weep and wash my feet in the water of all that is now going to be great again in November.
Thnk you CCP.
What?
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
562
|
Posted - 2016.08.29 16:48:11 -
[2] - Quote
Retar Aveymone wrote:Oobiedoob Benubi wrote:Linus Gorp wrote:Oobiedoob Benubi wrote:Amazing. You've figured out a way to destroy the entire CASMA community. CCP, you really suck. Who is CASMA? Senpai Fozzie, when do we get blops rebalance? CASMA is/was a mining community in Gallente space. We recruited by offering free boosts in various systems. perhaps you will need to recruit by taking the very tiny effort to actually man the keyboard and warp to belts now
For what, to provide a one cycle boost? Possibly 2.
I was about to buy a Rorq, man I'm so glad I didn't now. Once again Fozzie, Seagull and team 5o screw over a whole part of the game to provide targets....
How many mining fleets can you see in null having one on grid? No chance of it without a combat fleet backup, so they might get used in corp ops.
There's no chance of me putting a Rorq, Orca or much of anything else on grid that doesn't stand a chance of warping away when a red fleet hits the system.
So we better get used to no boost mining I suppose.
Cheers Fozzie ..i..
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
563
|
Posted - 2016.08.29 16:56:50 -
[3] - Quote
Obil Que wrote:Drago Shouna wrote:So we better get used to no boost mining I suppose. And those that take the risk will reap the rewards...
And provide the juicy killmails...
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
563
|
Posted - 2016.08.29 17:01:11 -
[4] - Quote
Remember the part of the DevBlog that mentioned the new Porpoise Industrial Command Ship? I'm will to bet that's going to be a BC sized ship that can fit Mining Foreman Links. I'm willing to bet they already expected Orca spam to be untenable and that's why they're adding a new ship to balance that out.
Obvioulsy that's 100% speculation, but why else would they need to add another Industrial Command Ship?[/quote]
They said already that we're getting an ORE battlecruiser (cost ~40 to 50 million) for exactly that reason.[/quote]
Ah, thanks for the info![/quote]
I thought the changes infer that they are getting rid of Mining Foreman Links, so you'll only get these.
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
565
|
Posted - 2016.08.29 18:01:04 -
[5] - Quote
MidnightWyvern wrote:Draconas109 wrote:MidnightWyvern wrote:Draconas109 wrote:I'm going to kindly remind who puts food on your table and a house over your heads.
Your customers who pay cash money to play this game, and when you **** off your customers, they'll take their money with them and go somewhere else.
Just putting that out there. Implying you speak for anyone but yourself. Getting cold and lonely on that pedestal? I'm not the only one not thrilled with this change if you'd spend 5 seconds looking at other posts and their likes going up. Because Forum Likes are how we judge good or bad ideas, right? Using a populist approach like that sure worked wonders for Sony Online Entertainment with their still massively successful game Planetside 2. Oh wait... Sarcasm aside, how many times have we seen people initially freak out in the Comments thread on the DevBlog and then those same people are playing the game months later, still bitching but not having left like they swore they were going to? **** changes in online games, man. World of Warcraft has apparently been dumbing down their gameplay more and more with each successive release and they still have millions of subscribers, many of whom regularly swear they're quitting as soon as the next update drops and have been doing so for years without ever actually leaving permanently. Off-grid boosting was becoming a problem, and in the best case it represented yet another requirement for dedicated afk alts in order to be competetive. Is that really good design? Is that really the best way for people to have FUN in a game? Not being able to know if the small gang that your small gang just engaged with might have a fully tricked out Command Ship running Mindlink-buffed Warfare Links sitting in a safe? Let's not forget how many times in that DevBlog CCP reiterated that they are going to be changing aspects of that design proposal based on all the player feedback they get. If you don't like the changes, post suggestions for how you'd like them to work and stop just threatening to drop your subscription.
And yet they don't do anything about neutral boosters?
I fully accept that off grid boosting or neutral boosting in a battle scenario could be annoying as ****.
But how the hell did boosting 4 or 5 miners ever have any impact on a battle?
Why not leave the cycle/range/cap boost for Miners out of it, the only thing it achieves is a nerf (again) to mining, nothing else.
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
565
|
Posted - 2016.08.29 18:07:21 -
[6] - Quote
Elenahina wrote:Draconas109 wrote:these boosting changes are flat out ********, on grid mining boosts that require ammunition to run.
Has CCP ever tried to be in a null industrialists boots for a week without their dev tools and see how annoying it is to mine and not get killed? 3 hours a day I can probably get to mine with reds constantly in system and managing barges is hard enough, now we have to baby sit multiple boosters?
No, im being serious, this is a giant middle finger in our faces, and an ammo requirement is the cherry on top of the **** mountain. Did you miss the part where it said they would be really small and the boosters would have large ammo capacities? It's not like you're going to have to micromanage the damned things. Sheesh.
Nope but you're going to have to sit there left clicking every 30-90s to keep the boost going...
Wait...is there an app for that ;)
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
567
|
Posted - 2016.08.29 18:18:21 -
[7] - Quote
Winter Archipelago wrote:Tau Cabalander wrote:Team Five 0 wrote:However, Command Burst bonuses do stack on top of bonuses from other sources (such as modules and implants) and this interaction may be subject to diminishing returns (stacking penalties) depending on the attribute being affected. The only thing that gives me pause is the stacking penalty. Example: Seems odd that it may benefit a mining ship to NOT fit a MLU. Maybe it'll finally get some career miners to fit a tank instead of going for pure yield, then whining about how they have it so hard compared to others when every other activity in the game has to decide on their own personal balance between tank and gank.
Oh shut up and take it to the other thread where this is being debated.
And just for your information...we already decide, every day, whether to fit tank or yield.
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
570
|
Posted - 2016.08.29 19:16:04 -
[8] - Quote
Ancy Denaries wrote:Drago Shouna wrote:
I was about to buy a Rorq, man I'm so glad I didn't now. Once again Fozzie, Seagull and team 5o screw over a whole part of the game to provide targets....
How many mining fleets can you see in null having one on grid? No chance of it without a combat fleet backup, so they might get used in corp ops.
There's no chance of me putting a Rorq, Orca or much of anything else on grid that doesn't stand a chance of warping away when a red fleet hits the system.
So we better get used to no boost mining I suppose.
Cheers Fozzie ..i..
Glorious tears. Adapt or die.
Finished trolling yet idiot? BTW, it just saved me 2.2 bil plus fittings :)
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
606
|
Posted - 2016.09.21 11:47:32 -
[9] - Quote
Just for those who haven't seen this yet.......
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=493696&find=unread
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
Drago Shouna
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
612
|
Posted - 2016.10.02 10:51:31 -
[10] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:You do understand PvP does not mean combat right? As for being bumped you can either gank or bump the bumper you are not helpless
Will you ever stop trolling every post?
Solecist Project...." They refuse to play by the rules and laws of the game and use it as excuse ..."
" They don't care about how you play as long as they get to play how they want."
Welcome to EVE.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|